top of page
  • Jasmine Wells

Dust Bunnies in Space: Princeton, Astrophysics, and my Infinite Wisdom

Updated: Feb 5

Stop right there! Yes, you! You are probably wondering why you have stumbled upon this paper. Coincidence? I think not! I believe that you, like myself, are secretly an avid interstellar dust fanatic. If that is the case, then look no further because this is your lucky day. I have decided to take a closer look at one of the leading pieces of research on interstellar dust dynamics: "Dust dynamics in RAMSES - I. Methods and turbulent acceleration," co-authored by G. Moseley, R. Teyssier, and B. T. Draine. For those unfamiliar with this article, you can either click on the attached link and spend your next Saturday morning reading this twenty-page research article, or you could refer to the following summary.

In this "Buzz Lightyear" type space study, astrophysicists wanted to understand how tiny particles, like space dust, move around. They used a computer program called RAMSES to help them create a virtual space simulator. They were especially interested in how turbulence, which is like space winds, affects the dust. It's kind of like figuring out how leaves move when the wind is blowing. They applied pre-validated scientific theories and methodology to accurately study this phenomenon.

I took a specific interest in the researchers' choice to utilize an operator-split method for integrating bi-opposing forces. Essentially, they used a methodology called "operator-split" to deal with two forces, Drag and Lorentz, acting on dust in each cell. But, I think they might have been better off using a method called "coupled." With operator-split, they handle each force separately, like solving one piece of a puzzle at a time. However, if they used the coupled method, they could have solved the equations for both forces together. It's like trying to solve a math problem where two things depend on each other; you should solve them together using a system of equations to minimize problem-solving time. The coupled method could capture more of the real interactions between the dust and gas, making the simulation more realistic and leading to more accurate observations. All that being said, I do realize that using the coupled method might introduce some potential inaccuracies because it deals with different timescales. Picture it like trying to watch a Formula One race and a marathon at the same time; it could get tricky. However, in this case, since the Lorentz and Drag forces evolve at an incredibly similar rate, it's like both races are moving at almost the exact same speed. Therefore, I am making the case that in this specific situation, the benefits of considering the forces together outweigh the potential downsides.

And there you have it, folks! There is my two cents as a pretentious high schooler critiquing a certified research paper written by a handful of Princeton’s brightest graduate students. So, whether you're a dust enthusiast or truly just happened to stumble upon this article by cosmic chance, don’t forget to remember the name Jasmine Wells because I am going places out of this world.

550 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page